ÿþ<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>ANGLO-SIKH RELATIONS</TITLE> <style type="text/css"> .BODY { background-color: #EAF1F7; background-image: url('images/gtbh.jpg'); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: fixed; background-position: center; color: #0066CC;} .C1{text-align: justify;color: #0066CC;FONT-size: SMALL;FONT-family: Tahoma;} .BIB{text-align: center;color: #000099;FONT-size: SMALL;FONT-family: Tahoma;} .CONT{text-align: right;color: #FF0000;FONT-size: SMALL;FONT-family: Tahoma;} </style><META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="ANGLO,SIKH,RELATIONS"> <META http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></HEAD> <BODY class="BODY" oncontextmenu="return false" ondragstart="return false" onselectstart="return false"> <FONT ALIGN="JUSTIFY" FACE="Tahoma"> <p class="C1">&#65279ANGLO-SIKH RELATIONS need to be traced to the transformation of the British East India Company, a commercial organization, into a political power in India. Victory at Plassey (23 June 1757) brought Bengal under the <i>de facto</i> control of the British, and that at Buxar (22 October 1764) made Oudh a British protectorate. By August 1765, the grant of the <i>d&#299w&#257n&#299</i> rights to the Company by the Mu<u>gh</u>al Emperor Sh&#257h '&#256lam made them the virtual rulers of Bengal, Bih&#257r and O&#7771iss&#257. Robert Clive (1725-74), the victor of Plassey and governor of Bengal during 1765-67, watched with interest the repeated invasions of India by Ahmad Sh&#257h Durr&#257n&#299 and rejoiced at his final repulse at the hands of the Sikhs in 1766-67. Expressing his happiness over Ahmad Sh&#257h's failure to advance towards the Indian heartland, he wrote to Naw&#257b Waz&#299r of Oudh on 19 February 1767, ". . . extremely glad to know that the Sh&#257h's progress has been impeded by the Sikhs. . . As long as he does not defeat the Sikhs or come to terms with them, he cannot penetrate into India. And neither of these events seems probable since the Sikhs have adopted such effective tactics, and since they hate the Sh&#257h on account of his destruction of the Chak [Gur&#363 Chakk, i. e. Amritsar]. " At the same time, in another despatch to Sh&#257h Wal&#299 <u>Kh</u>&#257n, Ahmad Sh&#257h's prime minister, Clive offered congratulations on the Sh&#257h's victory over the Sikhs for whom he uses such epithets as "perfidious" and "tyrannous. "</p> <p class="C1">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Since the fall of Sirhind to them in January 1764, the Sikhs had extended their area of operations to Ga&#7749g&#257-Yamun&#257 Do&#257b and Ruh&#299lkha&#7751&#7693 bordering on the territories of the Naw&#257b of Oudh. Jha&#7751&#7693&#257 Si&#7749gh Bha&#7749g&#299 (d. 1775), a powerful Sikh <i>sard&#257r, </i> in a letter dated 19 August 1771 addressed to General Robert Barker (1729-89) sought friendly relations with the British. Warren Hastings (1732-1818), governor of Bengal since 1772 and made governor-general in 1773, was however deeply perturbed at the increasing power of the Sikhs. He wanted to know all about them. At his request Major Antoine Louis Henri Polier (1741-95), a Swiss Engineer in the company's military service but then employed by Emperor Sh&#257h '&#256lam II, submitted to him, in 1776, a detailed account of the Sikhs. This paper was never published, but it was quoted by George Forster (d. 1792), a civil servant of the company who under Warren Hastings' order journeyed through the Punjab, Kashm&#299r and Afghanistan disguised as a Turkish traveller and wrote <i>A Journey from Bengal to England, </i> published in 1798. Two articles on Sikh history by Polier also appeared in the <i>Asiatic Annual Register</i> for 1800 and 1802.</p> <p class="C1">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, the Sikhs audaciously continued their raids into the Do&#257b and Ruh&#299lkha&#7751&#7693. The latter territory had been conquered by the Naw&#257b of Oudh with British help in 1774, and thus formed part of the British protectorate. In December 1778, the entry of the Sikhs into Ruh&#299lkha&#7751&#7693 was resisted by British troops who, by their superior discipline and training as well as by their artillery, were able to force the Sikhs to retire. In January 1783, Sard&#257r Beghel Si&#7749gh (d. 1802), at the head of a large force, approached An&#363pshahr on the western bank of the Ga&#7749g&#257 and was contemplating to cross the river into Ruh&#299lkh&#7751&#7693 when the force of the Naw&#257b of Oudh appeared on the opposite bank. Some British battalions also arrived on the scene. The Sikhs retreated, changed direction and plundered, during February 1783, the southern districts of the Do&#257b up to Shikoh&#257b&#257d and Farru<u>kh</u>&#257b&#257d, pillaging &#256gr&#257 on their way back. In the following month they raided the northern parts of Delhi itself. Warren Hastings directed Major James Browne, the British Agent at the Mu<u>gh</u>al court, to organize a confederacy against the Sikhs consisting of the Emperor Sh&#257h '&#256lam, the Mar&#257&#7789h&#257s, the Ruh&#299l&#257s and the Naw&#257b of Oudh, and also to collect more information about the Sikhs. Browne's attempt to form a confederacy failed but he did get in touch with several Sikh <i>sard&#257rs</i> including Baghel Si&#7749gh's <i>vak&#299l, </i> Lakhpat R&#257i, and compiled an account under the title <i>History of the Origin and Progress of the Sicks</i> [sic] for the information of the governor-general. It was later published, in 1788, in the <i>Indian Tracts</i> series.</p> <p class="C1">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;In response to Browne's overtures leading Sikh <i>sard&#257rs</i> expressed their willingness to form a friendly alliance with the British, but the latter were too apprehensive of their power. In January 1784, a body of 30, 000 Sikh horse and foot crossed the Yamun&#257. The British government was alarmed and strengthened their garrisons at Bareilly and Fatehga&#7771h. James Browne informed Warren Hastings about the threatening attitude of the Sikhs, but said that Karam Si&#7749gh, the leader of the expedition, had, out of regard for British friendship, persuaded the other Sikh <i>sard&#257rs</i> not to cross the Ga&#7749g&#257 into the territories of the Naw&#257b of Oudh, an ally of the English. Warren Hastings prepared, in December 1784, his own plan to checkmate the Sikh influence at Delhi. According to it Jah&#257&#7749d&#257r Sh&#257h, the rebel son of the Emperor Sh&#257h '&#256lam, was to be instigated to organize opposition to the Sikhs at the imperial court while the Emperor was to receive military help from the British and the Naw&#257b of Oudh. This plan, however, also failed partly because M&#257h&#257dj&#299 Scind&#299&#257, the Mar&#257&#7789h&#257 chief, would not allow a passage to British troops to reach Delhi through his trans-Yamun&#257 territory. On 30 March 1785, Amb&#257j&#299 I&#7749gle, one of Scind&#299&#257's generals, made a provisional treaty of peace and friendship with the Sikhs. But during April 1785, Sikhs' emissaries waited upon British commanders at Farru<u>kh</u>&#257b&#257d and Lucknow offering to form an alliance with them against the Mar&#257&#7789h&#257s. Nothing came out of either set of parleys.</p> <p class="C1">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Warren Hastings left India on 1 February 1785. John Macpherson, the acting governor-general, deputed on 19 June 1786 George Forster, who had already travelled through the Sikh territories, to establish contacts with the Sikhs and collect intelligence about their future designs. The new governor-general, Lord Cornwallis (September 1786 to October 1793), favoured a policy of caution and persuasion in dealing with the Sikhs and instructed the British Resident at Lucknow to please the Sikh <i>vak&#299l</i> or agent posted there. At the same time he cautioned the Naw&#257b of Oudh to ensure stricter vigilance at An&#363pshahr and D&#257r&#257nagar ferries and assured him of British reinforcements as and when needed.</p> <p class="C1">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;In December 1790, a Sikh band of 300 men attacked Longcroft, an Englishman in indigo business, at village Jalaul&#299 in 'Al&#299ga&#7771h district, but retired as their leader was killed by the villagers. Soon after, Bha&#7749g&#257 Si&#7749gh of Th&#257nesar assuming the leadership advanced on An&#363pshahr where he collected <i>r&#257kh&#299</i> and captured, on 3 January 1791, the local British commander, Lieutenant-Colonel Robert Stuart, whom he brought to Th&#257nesar and demanded 2, 00, 000 rupees as ransom for his release. Many Englishmen offered to collect this amount but Lord Cornwallis did not agree. Ultimately a sum of Rs 60, 000 was paid through Begam Samr&#363 and the Colonel was set free on 24 October 1791.</p> <p class="C1">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;With their conquest of Delhi on 11 September 1803, the British had established their supremacy in the region. Meanwhile, Mah&#257r&#257j&#257 Ra&#7751j&#299t Si&#7749gh had emerged as the ruler of the Sikhs, overpowering the <i>misl</i> chiefs. The Sikh raids into the Do&#257b and the region north of Delhi came to an end. The cis-Sutlej Sikh chiefs accepted the suzerainty of the British who now entered into direct relationship with the Sikh monarch, Ra&#7751j&#299t Si&#7749gh.</p> </font> <p class="BIB"> BIBLIOGRAPHY<p class="C1"><ol class="C1"><li class="C1"> Hasrat, B J. , <i>Anglo-Sikh Relations. </i> Hoshiarpur, 1968<BR> <li class="C1"> Bal, S. S. , <i>British Policy Towards the Panjab 1844-49. </i> Calcutta, 1971<BR> <li class="C1"> Sarkar, Jadunath, <i>Fall of the Mughal Empire. </i> Calcutta, 1932<BR> <li class="C1"> Harbans Singh, <i>The Heritage of the Sikhs. </i> Delhi, 1983<BR> </ol><p class="CONT">Har&#299 R&#257m Gupta<br></p><BR> </font> <img src="counter.aspx" width="1px" height="1px" alt=""> </HTML></BODY>